tobermoryhs

7 responses so far ↓

• 1    Lauren McGowan // May 29, 2006 at 11:14 am

  Scott and Andrew were very good, with the penunsiation and the acent.
  Kyle and Jenny were good at the extended coversations.

• 2    kyle // May 29, 2006 at 11:15 am

  they were good but people need to speak louderand we need to work on prenounsation one of the cryterias was met and that was go beyond basic scenario.

• 3    Scott MacColl // May 29, 2006 at 11:19 am

  I thought that david and Laurens conversation was good they prenounced the words well and kept fluency. They could speak a bit louder and clearer.

  I thought that kyle and jennys conversation was quite good but they could have spoken more fluently. They could work on there pronunciation.

• 4    Rebecca // May 29, 2006 at 11:22 am

  I thought that andrew and scott were quite fluent and the conversation was extended.
  I thought that the pronounciation was good in david and lauren’s conversation and kyle and Jenny went beyond the basic scenario.

• 5    Dave // May 29, 2006 at 11:23 am

  we all could of put a bit more emotion into the talks, they all just seemed so dull to listen to, but they were all pronounced well and spoken in good French

• 6    jenny mcdowalll // May 29, 2006 at 11:25 am

  Andrew and Scott said theres with very good extened sentences and Larren and davids was really clear and well structured .I needed to speak louder but kyles part was good.

• 7    Andrew // May 29, 2006 at 11:29 am

  David & Lauren
  This was a well planned conversation although sentences were not very extended, the pronounciation was good. This conversation did not go far past a baisic scenario. 5/10

  Kyle & Jenny
  Extended sentences were used but they weren’t speaking very fluently and Jenny was too quiet. This conversation did go past baisic scenario. 5/10

  Me & Scott
  I think we could’ve used longer sentences at the begining but we used them at the end. I think we did try to go past a baisic scenario and I think we managed to speak fluently.(ish)